Foundation of a family: Importance, obstacles and possible solutions
| Foundation of a family: Importance, obstacles and possible solutions |
| Written by Nasreen Ahsan, Hafsa Ahsan |
| Policy Perspectives , Vlm 1, No.1
A family is the basic structural unit of any society. Society is defined as the social system made up of inter-related and inter-dependent institutions, such as family, education, work, religion and law. Gordon Marshall, a sociologist defined a family as:
“An intimate domestic group made up of people related to one another by bonds of blood, sexual mating or legal ties. It has been a very resilient social unit that has survived and adapted through time.”Family in IslamThe family is an important social institution, functioning positively for both the individual as well as the society. According to the sociologist George Peter Murdock, a family is the primary agent of socialization, and socializes new members into the culture of the society by teaching them common societal norms and values. The family controls society's members to maintain consensus and social order through the institution of marriage.According to the Islamic principles, a family comes into being through the institution of marriage and then children. But a family also includes the parents of the husband and any unmarried siblings as well to form a vertically extended family. Islam not only encourages marriage as a means of preventing sexual anarchy in the wider society, but it also has defined certain relationships (“muharramat”) between which there cannot be any marriage at all. Ayat 23 of Surah An-Nisasays; “Forbidden unto you are your mothers, and your daughters, and your sisters, and your father's sisters, and your mother's sisters, and your brother's daughters and your sister's daughters, and your foster mothers, and your foster sisters, and your mothers-in-law, and your stepdaughters who are under your protection (born) of your women unto whom you have gone in but if you have not gone in unto them, then it is no sin for you (to marry their daughters) and the wives of your sons who (spring) from your own loins. And (it is forbidden unto you) that you should have two sisters together, except what has already happened (of that nature) in the past. Lo! Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful.” Marriage has been prescribed as a sacred relationship in the Qur’an in the following ayahs of Surah An-Nisa. “Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that you seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. So wed them by permission of their folk, and give unto them their portions in kindness, they being honest, not debauched nor of loose conduct.” Hence we see that illicit relations of any kind are strongly prohibited in Islam. The breeding of the new generation and emotional security for women are two aspects strongly emphasized upon by the Islamic social system, which regards cohabitation as nothing more than a means to render children with doubtful lineage. The entire burden in such cases comes on the women who are then expected to bring up such children as single mothers. Such children then go on to form their own unstable relationships in the future and the cycle goes on. Islam restricts all sexual conduct to within the marital relations and prohibits such conduct between the very close relationships within the family itself. Here the basis of relationships is piety and fear of Allah (SWT). To restrict such an urge for misconduct outside the family, Islam enforces the rulings on modesty, hijab, lowering the gaze, fasting etc. A family in Islam is supposed to be an avenue for emotional support, security and socialization, whereby the right religious knowledge and values are transmitted to the next generation. Leadership in the family no doubt has been given to the male but it has more to do with the additional responsibilities of financial support on the male members of the family rather than an added advantage. Similarly, the fact that women's sphere of activity is concerned with housework and childcare, does not declare her to be an inferior entity in the family. Men and women enjoy equal rights in the eyes of Allah (SWT), however, the degree that men have been created above women amounts to additional responsibility rather than additional rights. A family is supposed to be a democracy on the micro level for it to reflect in the political system of the country at the macro level. Nowhere is the “qawwam” status of men made tantamount to them being tyrannical dictators requiring unquestioning obedience from the female members of the family. To date, the Islamic concept of family has never come under fire or become an object of controversy. This is mainly because the general rulings on the definition of relationships are generally accepted by the wider society and effectively implemented in all Islamic households. However, the questions raised in the contemporary world either emerge out of ignorance of these teachings, or behavior in the name of Islam is highlighted to such an extent that the common person who is not well aware of what the Islamic teaching on the issue really is, starts blaming Islam for the oppression of women within the family, just as the feminists and post-modernists attacked the functionalists. Such issues include wife abuse, domestic violence, child abuse, stove burning, honor killing, making a mockery of divorce, and excessive suspicion of the conduct of the wife. “Status and Role of Women Towards Equality, Development and Peace” by Women Aid Trust put it in the following words: “Here, it is important to clarify one crucial point on equality. Islam is not an idealistic approach to life but a natural one. It therefore differentiates between human equality and functional equality of man and woman. As for the functional equality, it takes into consideration, their essential biological differences and determines their functional spheres accordingly. Men, generally speaking, have greater physical strength and arc less prone to emotions and are less impulsive as well. It is a matter of common observation that in a situation of emergency, it is men who rush to the rescue of women and not vice versa. That is why man has been given the responsibility of being her protector in conjugal life and otherwise. The Islamic principle brings into existence not a male dominated system but a male-headed responsibility system based on a clear-cut idea of the division of labor. Now, to say that this system is based on female suppression is only an example of vilification. Islam, no doubt, considers man and woman equal as human beings, but not identical. It does not confuse the concept of equal sexes with the concept of identical sexes in view of the most apparent biological, emotional and psychological differences between the two sexes. It would be rather injustice (particularly to women) to consider men and women identical and ignore the essential differences between them. Therefore, in matters related to the protection of the rights of the weaker sex discriminates in its favor, and in matters related to bearing the responsibilities Islam favors man. Thus, the division of labor is effected along the just principle of potentialities and capabilities and not along any abstract impracticable ideals. Factors Important in the Foundation of a Family
Western Theorists versus the Islamic ApproachThe functionalist school of Western thought is very much in line with the Islamic concept of family. George Peter Murdock believed in the family performing four functions both for the individual and the society. He named those functions as providing sexual gratification for the couple and limiting the same outside marriage, reproducing and adding to the members of the society, socializing the new generation into the proper norms and values of the society and economic cooperation.J. Titlcott Parsons' theory bordered on the same principles. He named primary socialization (socialization of the child into the society in its early formative years) as one of the major functions of the family, encompassing not only the internalization of the society's culture, but also the effective structuring of the child's personality. Another function of the family is the stabilization of adult personalities, whereby the married couple provides emotional support for each other, and act as a counterweight for the stresses of the daily life. Brigitte and Peter Berger also named welfare of the child, moral values, economic success and religious factors as being the main defining characteristics of the family. The sociologists who criticized the above theories said that a family is dysfunctional for the society. Modern theorists or modem feminist school of thought has totally changed the traditional view of the family. In his study, The Runaway World, Edmund Leach an anthropologist vehemently stressed on the fact that a family exerts so much pressure on its members that the result is stress and tensions which breed hostility, fear and suspicion of the outside world. R. D. Laing in The Politics of the Family went a step further in blaming the disease of schizophrenia on what he called the exploitative relationships in the family, where the family members lose their own personality since they are too concerned with what others feel and think and this is what is psychologically damaging. Margaret Benston regarded the women's work of giving birth to and rearing children as reproduction of cheap labor. Fran Ansley regarded the stabilization of adult personalities as nothing more than the wife's duty to absorb the frustration of the husband against the system. David Cooper termed the family as an ideologically conditioning device in which people learned nothing but how to be submissive and obedient in all situations. Christine Delphy and Diana Leonard stress that family plays a central role in maintaining the patriarchal relationships, which find expression in the wider society as well. The division of labor is oppressive to women, they say, since the head of household is always a male, females are never paid for their work, if women work in jobs they have to perform a double duty of housework as well and the male head of household enjoys a monopoly over other members of the society. Linda Nicholson “The Myth of the Traditional Family” (1997) argues from a post-modernist perspective that alternative families sport more valued relationships than the traditional families. These alternative families can range from gay and lesbian couples to cohabitation, both with and without children. Cheshire Calhoun (1997) rejects marriage altogether saying that since family life within patriarchal heterosexual marriages is extremely oppressive for women, they be free to form any alternative relationships. Laura M. Purdy rejects motherhood totally, seeing it as a way to oppress women even further and bind them to their family. She advocates a 'baby strike' to make all the men of the world realize that feminists are serious about their demands for the liberation of women. The above theories are unnatural and unrealistic. The traditional theories stressed on 'segregated conjugal roles' whereby the husband specializes in certain activities and the wife does in others. The modern theories go for 'joint conjugal roles' where not only wives are supposed to work outside the house to prove their liberation but the husbands are also supposed to engage in housework. However, as studies have discovered there are very few totally egalitarian gender roles since women in most household assume a dual responsibility, both of doing a nine to five job and maintaining their house and children. More studies abound, which claim that even with women in the job market, decision making in the family remains segregated to men making the more significant decisions, money management is also segregated with husband-controlled pooling being dominant in most families, and women are required to put in a lot of emotional input into their relationships to ensure the survival of the family. The sociologists then conclude that it is in an alternative family that egalitarian gender roles are common with truly joint conjugal roles, sharing of childcare and housework and equitable domestic division of labor (Gillian Dunne, 1999). The Western theorists have not only made a mess out of the roles carved out for men and women, they have also altered the basic structure of the family. Extended family for them is what used to exist in pre-industrial times. The nuclear family is also an ancient kind of family structure, they say, which emerged after Industrialization. Now anybody who presupposes the term 'family' to mean 'a nuclear or extended family' is frowned upon for 'inappropriate generalizations.' A family is now a household which comprises people in a range of relationships, which can be anything from heterosexual to homosexual, with children own, adopted, or from a previous heterosexual relationship. New reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization and surrogate motherhood have shaken the very core of the relationships which were considered stable. The Western concept of family started to deteriorate after Industrialization, and when the period of Enlightenment came into being; it emphasized on religion being confined to a specific sphere of the society. Whereas Islam, which is a complete code of life, talks about piety Justice and kindness as the basis of all family relationships and nowhere can religion and family be considered dichotomized. On the other hand, in the secular approach of the Western system and the emergence of a new order based on Roman theories and thinking, the West does not have any stable base for the societal norms and values, which change with times and a changing lifestyle. Questionable Issues Regarding the FamilyThe most common objections, raised and blamed on Islam include:
Factors Destabilizing the Foundations of FamilyThe destabilizing factors are a direct result of the dominant philosophy (the capitalist mindset - which values everything on economic parameters) of the present-day world. With increasing effect of globalization and a smaller world due to communication, the world is under the control of a few privileged countries, which control all the resources and have made others subservient on the basis of their power and authority. Under the influence of these forces all over the world, people are forced to do dual work, hence the need for many women to work to meet the demands of the family. Here are some more destabilizing factors.
Influence of Western concepts: The Western concepts of feminism seem to be trickling into our family system as well. They mostly address women in the form of slogans such as “women liberation” and “women rights” and try to inculcate in them that family life is interfering with their rights and that they should go out and be independent. These slogans are mainly responsible for many women abandoning their children to day cares and governesses and working in full time jobs. This not only affects children in an adverse way, but also has a negative effect on family life, sometimes ending in a divorce as well. This mostly stems from an unawareness that family life does not infringe upon women's rights at all rather cements those in a positive way.
Regional Differences: Not all places in Pakistan face similar problems when it comes to family life. There are vast regional differences in the areas of:Media Portrayal of Role Models: How many times have we come across a TV play which actually portrays the family life, as it should be in Islam? Most of the times there seems to be a full independence given to both men and women to do whatever they want, and the parents don't even seem to exercise any control or apprise them of anything constructive. Slogans like “Jaisay Chaho Jiyo” and “Aap pay atki nazar sab kee” actually teach women ways to invite male attention and to do whatever they please, without any religious or moral boundaries. Drama serials like “Love Stories” seem to teach all the young people to engage in school and university romances. And it is these people in the media who become the role models for our young generation. They start idealizing about the sort of adult life which awaits them, and consequently when they do step into practical life and realize that life is not as glamorous as it is shown on TV, they fall into a deep depression and fail to appreciate what they already have. Family life then has no attraction for them. Increasing Effect of Materialism: Again, the media is to be blamed for this. Every single drama serial shows huge palatial homes, with lush green gardens and spacious lavish offices and handsome salaries. And there seems be a plethora of advertisements which talk about “making a phone call and earning thousands of rupees cash.” All this amounts to degrading the dignity of labor, and relying on secondary means to earn money. And naturally, when hard work and dignity of labor is downplayed, so are people's sentiments on those as well. And the result is that either people commit suicide when they are unable to meet the demands of their family members. Or they turn to other illegal means for the same. Obstacle in the Establishment of a FamilyEmphasis on same caste and creed: When looking for a suitable match, families often look for a person of the same caste and creed. This either leads to no marriage at all or to mismatched couples. These mismatched couples either end up divorcing or lead an empty shell marriage. In such cases, women easily fall prey to those liberation slogans discussed earlier, leaving the family life in shatters.Materialism: Materialistic families either look for those girls who can bring in a lot of dowry. Or they look for a family which will 'settle' their sons either in business or abroad in a good Job. For this, they reject all those religious girls who do not own a fortune, who live simply, who live in a rented house and who cannot afford a handsome dowry. Even the girl's parents want their daughter to marry somebody with a good job and handsome salary. Religion is no longer the preference. High Standards: This includes standards for physical appearance. For the groom's families, it often translates to the girl being tall, fair and slim. And she should know how to cook, how to exercise unquestioning submissiveness etc. Naturally in this day and age, not all girls will accept marriage to be some sort of a slavery contract. And so girls are rejected for 'having a mind of their own.
Honor Killings
Also, the vast exposure of all classes in urban areas to media means that they face other kinds of problems, such as free mixing, dating and all its aftermath. Killing on the basis of a suspicion Wani tradition Swara tradition Karo Kari Selling daughters in marriage Trafficking Solutions and Creating AwarenessEnsuring that every single person knows exactly what are the teachings of Islam regarding family life is the single most important solution. Even if the general attitude has to be changed, it can only be done so by spreading awareness about the Islamic principles and how they complement the high status to woman within the family. Only then will they be able to oppose the principles of feminism and take a stand against it. Awareness and attitude change needs to be stimulated in the male population of our country as well. Religious-minded for many translates to narrow minded. Many religious minded people themselves do not know that women have any rights at all in Islam: for them men have all the rights while women have all the responsibilities, This is because many times traditional local values are taken to be Islamic values. So what is needed is a mass awareness campaign and that can be effectively done through:
ConclusionIslam is a complete code of life. Rather than a ritualistic religion confined to the five pillars of Islam, it has a body of rules and regulations governing family life and only by following the Islamic injunctions, can one be assured not only of satisfaction from different relationships, but also an ample of reward from Allah (SWT). And deviating from these principles will not only disrupt family life, but also earn the wrath of Allah (SWT).Ayat 35 of Surah An-Nisa says “It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger, to have any option about their decision: if anyone disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong path.” |
Comments
Post a Comment